Monday, January 19, 2015

UW Update 1/19/15

1.     UW Update 1/19/15
a.     Drove back from Rockaway Beach with family. Read physics, slept.
b.     Arrived at dorm. Did some cleaning, then read for cow class. Sent some emails.
c.      Ate dinner with Ayush; figured out what professors we would interview for research class. Used my dining-card surplus to order extra meat and cheese on pasta & chicken; it was very good.
d.     Returned to dorm and did tutorial hw.
e.     Planned to play badminton, but the IMA was closed, so I took a run instead. Went along the Burke-Gilman trail for a while.
f.      Returned to the dorm, grabbed a chocolate milk from the Husky Card-accepting vending machine, took a shower, settled down to read for education class. Got derailed researching correlation between SAT and IQ—most recent research indicates this correlation is pretty strong, however IQ is only an OK predictor of standard measurements of life outcomes—weighting it with personality characteristics and HS grades provides a better correlation, according to both articles and the education book I’m reading. However, if the correlation between the SAT and IQ is strong, the question to answer is why low-income people that have received poor education flounder on the SAT. One guy argues that their IQs are genetically lower, but this doesn’t seem that compelling, given that the SAT is so strongly based on learned cultural things like proper use of standard American English. Is IQ a learned cultural thing? Or are correlations lousy on the low end of SAT scores? Articles raised more questions than answers. Found article arguing that IQ was a vector, consisting of verbal (like metaphor, maybe) and performance (working memory, flops, etc) components, and that imbalances in these components characterized autism (performance >> verbal) and ADHD (verbal >> performance). Not sure how this would fit with System 1/System 2. Found a weird, but extremely cited paper where the IQ equation seemed to negatively weight the verbal section of the SAT—need to figure out whether I’m interpreting the equation correctly.
g.     Brushed my teeth and hit the hay. (Better way to conclude this??)



No comments:

Post a Comment